In the clip on distribution contained in Story of Stuff; I agree that the real cost may
not be taken into account when we as the buyer purchase a product. But the reality
is if it was all taken into account only the very rich would be able to afford. So there
is the dilemma, keep prices to an affordable level, sustain these so the masses can
buy.To ensure the human cost is not unjust( low wages,pollution,energy,unsafe work enviroments), guidelines, best practice policies, legislation all need to be practised.For
this we need to look to our governments,national organisations related to particular
businesses, unions etc.To manage the 'true' cost we need to work with a code of ETHICS!
not be taken into account when we as the buyer purchase a product. But the reality
is if it was all taken into account only the very rich would be able to afford. So there
is the dilemma, keep prices to an affordable level, sustain these so the masses can
buy.To ensure the human cost is not unjust( low wages,pollution,energy,unsafe work enviroments), guidelines, best practice policies, legislation all need to be practised.For
this we need to look to our governments,national organisations related to particular
businesses, unions etc.To manage the 'true' cost we need to work with a code of ETHICS!
I agree. If prices are not affordable, it will not be available to the general public. Only to the very rich, as you mentioned. One option could be for governments to offer more research grants to find ways to sustain resources and to recycle and reuse items in a cost-effective way. If there is an incentive, e.g. school children can fundraise for their schools by recycling paper, plastic etc. or are given prizes for ideas they develop, then it would help to stimulate their interest in sustainable practices from a young age.
ReplyDelete